Tanmay Roasted But Critics Not Toasted

Tanmay’s “roast” is neither satire nor comedy and fits more in the category of abuse.

Satire, whether it be abrasive or mild, has a moral dimension and is intended to be corrective of ills perceived in society.

Comedy carries humour and while it might mock it does not scorn a subject.

Abusing anyone is impermissible. What is wrong with Tanmay’s “roast” is not its subject but its content.

The reaction to the “roast” however has more to do with the subject rather than its content. It is an unfortunate tendency in our country to exalt individuals into divinities and this enshrining makes any comment about them sacrilegious.

This cult of personality is but an inversion of Tanmay’s roast and is as bad. Unquestioning praise is as noxious as unadulterated abuse. And it carries as many anti-social tendencies as the former. Both are equally deficient in moral sense.

There being no critical thinking in the condemnation much in the same manner their is no humour in the roast. It is indeed a poor reflection on society which is unfamiliar both with warranted comments and justifiable criticism.

One thought on “Tanmay Roasted But Critics Not Toasted

  1. With all due respect, it was meant to be a joke. A joke is supposed to be amusing, what’s the point if it lacks any humour? Whoever posted this video didn’t want to lead you to think that “lata is 5000 years old”, and so on and on. If such jokes are not tolerated, don’t you think a time will come when we have a great laugh on jokes for 5 year old kids. It’s time we stop being pussies.😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s